Skip to content

Seven reasons your revenue is stuck, and only one of them is marketing

Four of these are stages of a funnel you can pull on. Three sit underneath it. Treating a blocker as a lever is how good money follows bad.

6 minute read

Notebooks and screens on the same table.

Revenue that has stopped moving is rarely a mystery, but it is frequently misread. The symptom is always the same, which is the number. The cause is one of a small number of things, and they are not interchangeable.

We test seven. Four of them are stages of the revenue funnel, and you can pull on them directly. Three of them sit underneath the whole funnel, and no work on the funnel moves the number while one of them is in the way.

The four levers

Discovery. Not enough of the right people know you exist. This is the only one of the seven where more marketing is the direct answer, which is worth sitting with, because it is the answer most businesses are sold. The test is whether qualified enquiries are falling while everything downstream of them holds up.

Conversion. People know you and are not buying. Something between interest and purchase is failing, and it is usually the offer, the price, the proof or the sales process rather than the campaign. Buying more attention here is buying more people the chance to decline.

Retention. Customers buy once and disappear. This is the most consistently underrated of the seven because the cost is invisible on a monthly report. Reichheld and Sasser found in Harvard Business Review that cutting the defection rate by 5 percent raised profits by between 25 and 85 percent depending on the sector, with 85 percent in one bank branch system and 30 percent in an auto service chain. Every customer lost is acquisition you already paid for.

Expansion. You are strong in one market and cannot get into another. The trust you have does not travel automatically, and treating a new market as a distribution problem when it is a credibility problem is the standard way to lose the entry budget.

The three blockers

Founder dependency. The business cannot grow beyond one person's capacity. Revenue stops when the founder stops, because the relationships, the judgement and the closing all live in the same head. This one is uncomfortable to name because the founder is usually the person commissioning the work.

Reputation. How you are perceived is blocking commercial progress. This is not a public relations abstraction. A trust deficit shows up as longer sales cycles, more discounting and deals that go quiet without explanation.

Offer. The product, the pricing or the positioning is the real problem. CB Insights, going through post-mortems written by failed startups, put no market need at the top of the list at 42 percent, ahead of running out of cash at 29 percent. The cash usually ran out while the company was promoting something the market did not want.

No campaign fixes what the market does not want to buy. It only makes the discovery more expensive and slightly faster.

A notebook of working, open beside a laptop.
Seven constraints, one of them tight. Working on any of the other six produces no additional revenue at all.

Why only one at a time

The instinct on seeing a list of seven is to work on all of them. That instinct is wrong, and the reason is structural rather than practical.

Eliyahu Goldratt's Theory of Constraints, set out in The Goal in 1984, holds that a system's output is governed by its single tightest constraint. Improving anything other than the constraint produces no additional output at all. The five focusing steps start with identify the constraint, then exploit it, then subordinate everything else to it. Only when it stops being the constraint do you move to the next one.

Applied to revenue, this means a business with a conversion problem gets nothing from a better discovery programme. Not less than it hoped. Nothing. The extra prospects arrive at the same broken step and leave the same way, at a higher cost per head.

Diagnosing it yourself

You can get most of the way there with numbers you already have.

  • Qualified enquiries this quarter against the same quarter last year. Falling with everything else stable points at discovery.
  • Enquiry to sale conversion over twelve months. A decline here with steady enquiries points at conversion, and usually at the offer.
  • Repeat purchase rate and the gap between first and second purchase. Weak numbers point at retention.
  • Revenue concentration by market or segment. Strong in one and nowhere else points at expansion.
  • Share of deals the founder personally closed. Above about half points at founder dependency.
  • Sales cycle length and average discount. Both lengthening points at reputation.
  • Acquisition cost against lifetime value. Upside down points at the offer, and scale will make it worse.

The one that is usually wrong

In our experience the most common misdiagnosis is a conversion or offer problem read as a discovery problem, because discovery is the one with an obvious purchase attached. There is no product called fix your pricing, and there are a hundred agencies selling reach.

The second most common is retention read as a market problem. A business losing a third of its customers a year and replacing them concludes the category is hard. The category is fine. The bucket has a hole in it.

The third is founder dependency dressed up as a capacity problem. The business hires more people, the founder still closes everything that matters, and the new salaries become a cost rather than a lever. What has to change is the part of the process that only exists in one person's judgement, and that is a systems question rather than a headcount question.

Neither of those is a failure of effort. They are failures of sequencing, and sequencing is fixable in a fortnight if you are willing to look at the numbers before you look at the media plan.

One caution about the list. The constraint moves. Clear a conversion problem and the business will usually find that discovery is now the tightest thing in the system, which is exactly what should happen and exactly what the fifth focusing step warns about. A diagnosis is accurate for a period, not permanently, and a growth system that is worth having includes the habit of asking the question again once the last answer has stopped being true.

Sources

Every figure above is linked to the study it came from. Where a finding has a specific scope, the scope is stated in the sentence that uses it.

  1. 01Reichheld and Sasser, Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services, Harvard Business Review, 1990, summarised in The Value of Keeping the Right Customers
  2. 02CB Insights, The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail
  3. 03Eliyahu M. Goldratt, The Goal, 1984, and the five focusing steps of the Theory of Constraints

Not sure which of the seven is yours?

That is what the Revenue Diagnostic is for. It maps your growth channels, tests all seven, and comes back with the one that is actually costing you money.

What number are you trying to move?